M.P.s To Quiz Report Of Blackmail Bid (Press, 29 July 1982)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: M.P.s To Quiz Report Of Blackmail Bid (Press, 29 July 1982)
On 29 July 1982, it was reported that Commander Michael Trestrail, the former bodyguard to the Queen, resigned earlier this month following revelations of a long-term affair with a homosexual prostitute. The resignation has led to forthcoming questioning in Parliament directed at Home Secretary Mr William Whitelaw regarding Trestrail’s possible exposure to blackmail. According to a report by the "Sun" newspaper, Trestrail had kept a blackmail attempt secret for three years, involving a note demanding money with the threat of exposing his homosexuality if he did not comply. The report claimed that upon receiving the note, Trestrail threatened to report the blackmailer to Scotland Yard, which seemingly caused the blackmail attempt to cease without further action. The incident came to light when Trestrail was confronted by Assistant Commissioner of Crime, Mr Gilbert Kellard, 12 days prior to the parliamentary inquiries. Attorney General Sir Michael Havers commented on the situation, highlighting the distinction between stable relationships that are open and well-known, and hidden associations that could lead to blackmail risk. He expressed concern about the implications of being involved with someone who may have connections to the criminal underworld, characterising it as a situation that could leave individuals vulnerable to exploitation. In the wake of Trestrail's resignation, Superintendent Christopher Hagon has been appointed as the new police officer responsible for the Queen's protection, with reports indicating he has already been seen performing duties at Buckingham Palace. The developments surrounding Trestrail's affair and the subsequent fallout raise significant questions regarding personal conduct within public service and the potential for private matters to intersect with official responsibilities.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand