AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Courts ‘anti-homosexual’ (Press, 21 April 1981)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Courts ‘anti-homosexual’ (Press, 21 April 1981)

At a Gay Rights national conference held at Victoria University in April 1981, Diane Wilson, spokeswoman for the Lesbian Advisory Committee, highlighted the significant discrimination faced by lesbians and gay men in child custody cases. Wilson noted that courts often expected homosexuals to regard their orientation as detrimental to their children's welfare. She pointed out that some judges rationalised denying custody or imposing discriminatory conditions by suggesting that it was in the best interest of the child to avoid any potential influence from a homosexual environment. This reasoning effectively used children as pawns in a broader social and legal disapproval of homosexuality. Wilson further explained that judges displayed anti-homosexual biases by assuming that gay individuals were incapable of providing a nurturing environment suitable for children. She expressed concern that such attitudes reinforced societal prejudices and undermined the rights of lesbian and gay parents. Alison Laurie, also addressing the conference, echoed Wilson's sentiments, stressing that New Zealand lagged behind many other countries regarding the rights afforded to homosexuals. She advocated for ongoing civil disobedience by the gay community while encouraging them to demonstrate their commitment to civic and national responsibilities. Laurie suggested that gay individuals could engage in community-focused initiatives, such as organising entertainment for vulnerable groups, establishing a national blood donation scheme, and enhancing public spaces through tree planting. She argued that these actions would illustrate the community’s concern for the well-being of all New Zealanders, rather than solely for their own rights.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:21st April 1981
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19810421_2_40.html