Father Donnelly’s Position (Press, 19 May 1980)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Father Donnelly’s Position (Press, 19 May 1980)
In a series of letters published in response to Rev. P. A. Drury's comments regarding the Catholic Church's treatment of Father Felix Donnelly, various correspondents express their views on the matter, particularly concerning issues of homosexuality and the Church's moral authority. J. V. Pierson argues that the Church is not intolerant and clarifies that Father Donnelly has not been silenced; instead, he is no longer allowed to speak on behalf of the Church and now speaks as an individual. Pierson suggests that while criticism is acceptable, promoting standards that diverge from those of the Church is not. In a more critical tone, Varian J. Wilson expresses concern over Father Donnelly's liberal views, which he believes undermine humanism by allegedly promoting homosexual practices. Wilson contends that, regardless of individual circumstances, those who engage in homosexual behaviour often have a compulsion that can be harmful. He advocates for compassion towards those suffering from these issues but insists that this does not equate to condoning behaviour he views as wrongful. Joyce Sumpter reacts to a letter from A. H. O’Neill by supporting Bishop Mackey's opposition to homosexuality. She opines that many Catholics appreciate his stance and highlights a distinction between compassion and tolerance. Sumpter references biblical teachings, suggesting that, while compassion is virtuous, it does not mean acceptance of ongoing sin. Lastly, G. K. Murrow questions the validity of Father Donnelly's views, asserting that if Christian ethics have remained unchanged for nearly 2000 years, it is improbable that Donnelly's liberal stance is correct. He argues that moral concepts have historical roots and remain relevant for maintaining societal order and community strength. Overall, the letters reflect a range of perspectives on morality, compassion, and the authority of the Church, with many contributors expressing a desire to uphold traditional Catholic teachings in the face of modern interpretations. The discussions mirror broader societal debates of the time regarding sexuality, ethics, and religious leadership.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand