Scandals Of Jerry’s Judges’ Could Ruin White House... (Press, 21 November 1979)

In November 1979, Governor Jerry Brown's bid for the presidency is marred by a series of scandals involving his judicial appointments, which have drawn criticism from both Californians and political opponents. As Brown campaigns in Washington, he presents himself as a source of "new leadership," yet the controversies surrounding his judges raise significant doubts about his judgment at a critical time for his presidential ambitions. Californians have been taken aback by the misconduct of several judges appointed by Brown. One judge, Paul Halvonik, is under investigation for growing 323 marijuana plants, while another, Robert Stevens, faces allegations of making obscene phone calls to female state employees. A third judge has been linked to the Mexican mafia, and a fourth has been accused of writing bad cheques. The political fallout has led to an unprecedented ten of Brown's nominees being rejected by voters, and the State Supreme Court is rife with internal conflict, particularly concerning Chief Justice Rose Bird. Criticism of Brown's appointments has been harsh. Republican State Senator remarked, “Boy, can Jerry pick ’em,” highlighting how the controversies have jeopardised the reputation of California's court system and resulted in a costly $510,000 inquiry. The inquiry, however, found no grounds for charges against Bird and her associates, which has prompted further criticism for lack of transparency. Brown’s supporters, including his legal affairs chief Anthony Kline, assert that the governor’s promotion of women and minorities to the bench is a historic achievement, claiming he has diversified the judiciary more than any predecessor. However, this push has sparked controversy, notably following his appointment of openly gay judge Steven Sachs, marking a significant but contentious shift in California's judicial landscape. The Halvonik case draws particular attention, not only for its legal implications but for personal dynamics, as Halvonik's wife, Deborah, refuses a plea deal when it includes marriage counselling, citing "blatant sexism." Both face potential disbarment and imprisonment if convicted. With tensions rising and infighting among the judges exacerbating the situation, conservative judges express their frustration, leading to the California Supreme Court being the subject of ridicule. Brown's political opponents point to these issues as evidence that he has endangered his political future by prioritising minority representation over seasoned judicial appointments. As Brown gears up for the upcoming Democratic convention in January, observers predict a challenging path. There are indications that he may fall behind Senator Edward Kennedy and could struggle even to secure a second-place finish against President Carter. The controversies surrounding "Jerry's Judges" are seen as a significant setback as he attempts to garner support in a highly competitive presidential race. Despite the challenges, one assemblyman humorously noted, "Jerry’s sewn up the dopers’ vote," highlighting the mixture of serious political implications and public perception plaguing Brown's campaign.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand