Tribunal Reserves Decision On Hook (Press, 23 June 1979)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Tribunal Reserves Decision On Hook (Press, 23 June 1979)
On 23 June 1979, the Indecent Publications Tribunal in Wellington, New Zealand, reserved its decision regarding a controversial book titled “Make It Happy — What Sex Is All About.” This book, described as a sex manual aimed at primary school children, elicited significant concern from the Secretary of Justice, represented by Mr G. E. Tanner, who requested that access to the book be restricted to those over 18 years of age, unless under instruction. Mr Tanner articulated that while certain sections of the book—especially those discussing reproduction, contraception, diseases, health matters, and rape—might not be seen as objectionable, the overall content was not suitable for its intended readership. He pointed out that the book tended to normalise sexual activity among adolescents, including young children, reducing it to a mechanical act devoid of emotional or moral considerations. The text was accused of portraying sexual activity as something purely for physical pleasure, with undesirable outcomes merely framed as unwanted pregnancies or diseases. Additionally, Mr Tanner raised concerns about how the book approached sensitive topics such as homosexuality, sodomy, bestiality, and incest. He argued that the way these subjects were presented could suggest to children that they were natural and acceptable behaviours. The discussion surrounding legal implications was also problematic, as the laws referenced in the book were not reflective of New Zealand's legal context, but rather an Australian state's laws. This could mislead young readers into believing that any legislative restrictions were simply unjust laws. With a retail price of $2.95, Mr Tanner expressed concern regarding the book's accessibility to children, emphasising that its wide readership potential represented significant risks. The tribunal's decision remains pending as they consider the various arguments presented regarding the book's content, significance, and impact on young readers.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand