Women’s Win? Book Bid Retort (Press, 29 November 1978)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Women’s Win? Book Bid Retort (Press, 29 November 1978)
On 29 November 1978, a significant political development unfolded in New Zealand, highlighting the influence of women's organisations and public sentiment regarding literature and censorship. Mrs A. Elsthob, president of the National Organisation for Women, asserted that lobbying efforts by women's groups were instrumental in the defeat of former Minister of Social Welfare, Mr Walker, in the Papanui electorate. Elsthob emphasised the collective strength of female voters, indicating that their concerted efforts to challenge Walker's attitudes towards women's issues played a crucial role in his loss. She urged Members of Parliament to recognise that united action by women could indeed wield considerable power in the political arena. In another notable issue, the Booksellers’ Association expressed strong condemnation of actions taken by Miss Patricia Bartlett, president of the Society for the Protection of Community Standards. Bartlett had orchestrated the referral of twelve books to the Indecent Publications Tribunal, among them the widely-discussed "Hite Report." This referral came after Bartlett's meeting with the Minister of Customs, Mr Wilkinson, on 4 October 1978, which reportedly prompted the Customs Department to take action. Harold White, director of the Booksellers’ Association, voiced concerns regarding what he described as a "cosy arrangement" between Bartlett and law enforcement authorities. He questioned why those involved in the book industry struggle to have their voices heard in influential circles, while individuals advocating for the censorship of literature receive considerable attention and support. White's remarks highlight an ongoing tension between the promotion of literary freedom and the imposition of moral standards, reflecting broader societal debates on censorship and the role of women in advocacy.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand