AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

What Biggies Might Have Said On Australian Visit (Press, 10 October 1978)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: What Biggies Might Have Said On Australian Visit (Press, 10 October 1978)

On 10 October 1978, the children's literary character Biggles, created by Captain W. E. Johns, faced censorship in South Australia due to accusations of racism and reactionary themes. Biggles, known for his adventures as a pilot and having survived numerous perilous encounters, has made a significant impact on young readers for almost five decades. However, South Australia’s State Library has removed him from children’s reading lists, relegating his books to a specialised collection that would only be available for scholars and students. This decision was influenced by a paper presented at the 20th annual conference of the Australian Politics Studies Association in Adelaide by two Sydney academics. They argued that authors like Johns instilled politically significant attitudes within adolescent readers through their limited but consistent narratives, which they claim may have shaped readers' views on gender and societal roles. In particular, they pointed out that Biggles and his companions predominantly share emotional bonds with each other, implying subtle lessons about gender dynamics that suggest women require men while men can thrive independently. In response to the banning, a senior librarian explained the library's policy to avoid literature with violence or racist ideas, instead focusing on books that convey positive values. This stance garnered varied reactions, with some arguing that deeming Biggles as “racist” represents an excessive overreaction. Critics have also drawn attention to the content of contemporary literature recommended for young adults, citing topics such as sexual assault and drug use, which they argue can be far more disturbing for younger readers than the adventures of Biggles. Despite the ban, other states, such as New South Wales, have no immediate plans to follow South Australia's approach. Prominent literary figures like Ruth Park voiced concerns about the current selections for children, suggesting that while there should be room for books reflecting various realities, there should also be an emphasis on stories that inspire and motivate young readers. Writer Elisabeth Macintyre echoed this sentiment, advocating for a wide variety of literature for children, covering fun and adventurous themes alongside more serious subjects. Ultimately, while Biggles may no longer be available in South Australian libraries, the debate surrounding his legacy ignites discussions about children’s literature, censorship, and the values imparted through reading, illustrating the ongoing tension between traditional storytelling and modern societal expectations.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:10th October 1978
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19781010_2_105_3.html