AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Political Message “to Be Heard” (Press, 1 May 1978)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Political Message “to Be Heard” (Press, 1 May 1978)

On 1 May 1978, a series of letters to the editor highlighted the ongoing societal debates regarding homosexuality and civil rights, particularly in relation to music media and legislative changes. Martin Oelderink from the Gay Liberation Front in Christchurch responded to Varian J. Wilson's objections to the Tom Robinson Band’s song “Sing if you’re glad to be gay.” Oelderink argued that the song represents the struggles and oppression faced by gay individuals, contesting Wilson's characterisation of it as "homosexual propaganda." He suggested that listeners should have the freedom to choose their music and switch stations rather than have Radio New Zealand dictate taste. In another letter, L.E. Reid noted the repeal of a homosexual-rights law in St. Paul, Minnesota, which had been in effect for four years. The vote saw a significant majority in favour of repeal, with over 43,000 votes against the law compared to just under 22,000 in support. Reid reported that the Pastor of the Temple Baptist, a key figure in the repeal movement, expressed gratitude for the result, while leaders from the National Gay Task Force condemned the vote as a denial of civil rights for homosexuals. Wilson later wrote another letter conceding that he does not oppose consensual homosexual acts conducted in private but expressed concerns over the broader implications of gay liberation movements. He questioned the validity of statistical claims regarding the prevalence of homosexual activity in society, suggesting that such figures stem from biased surveys. Wilson maintained that public discourse on sexuality should not lead to legal or societal acceptance of what he deemed harmful practices, emphasising a distinction between consensual acts and more controversial issues such as child molestation. The exchange reflects the contentious nature of discussions surrounding gay rights in the late 1970s, highlighting significant social divisions and differing opinions on personal freedoms and societal norms. The correspondence concluded without further letters being accepted by the editor, indicating a desire to close the discussion on this heated topic.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:1st May 1978
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19780501_2_132_4.html