United Women—was It Just A Dream? (Press, 24 June 1977)

The United Women's Convention held in Christchurch has highlighted significant divisions and tensions within the women’s movement in New Zealand. Leone Stewart's report, dated 24 June 1977, emphasises a pivotal moment for the movement, suggesting it is at risk without strong, unified leadership focused on practical social changes. The exclusion of the media from the convention was a striking tactic that raised questions about the movement's cohesion. Many participants, including Ann Hercus and Margaret Wilson, expressed concern that the convention's unity was merely superficial. They believed that while it is vital to acknowledge diversity, the apparent consensus undermined the collective efforts established over the previous 18 months. Delegates felt their energy had been squandered due to tensions among factions, with some leaders wanting to deviate from previously established goals. Critics pointed out that such behaviour mirrored the negative traits associated with traditional male-led hierarchies, suggesting an irony in using methods contrary to the movement’s values. Concerns arose that the current leadership style might alienate ordinary women from the movement, which Helen Marieskind addressed by forecasting a bleak future for any organisation that abandoned grassroots support. The convention showcased vocal radical feminists but left moderate feminists feeling sidelined. There was a call to action for these moderates, as they recognise the need to assert their views and not cede the leadership to more extreme factions. Participants like Anne Hargreaves and Betty Loughead articulated a commitment to focus on specific aspects of feminism, reflecting a desire for a more grounded approach amidst the uncertainties. Many women also reflected on the necessary skills to ascertain effective communication of their perspectives and the need to build coalitions rather than retreat into silos. The role of the media was discussed, with opinions split on whether it was an ally or adversary of the movement. Ann Hercus argued the need for the movement to engage more proactively with the media to broaden awareness around women’s issues. The convention also sought to bridge differences between moderate and radical factions, with positive receptions towards diverse representations, including those from lesbian groups, suggesting an openness that could lead to better solidarity. However, the women's movement must now confront fundamental questions about its identity and purpose. With many women feeling disillusioned and questioning the leadership approaches, there is a pressing need for clarity on policies that address the root causes of discrimination. Overall, the convention's events prompted women to consider how best to navigate their future, underscoring a shared acknowledgment that unity, while challenging, is essential to moving forward effectively in the quest for women's rights.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand