United Women's Convention (Press, 11 June 1977)

The letters published in response to the United Women’s Convention highlight a range of perspectives on the event, which took place in June 1977 and attracted over 2,600 women. Joan Lewis expressed her shock at the perceived negativity towards men during the convention, suggesting that the atmosphere was filled with bitterness and rebellion, which she found alarming. She noted a lack of constructive dialogue, indicating that many attendees, like herself, left feeling disillusioned. In contrast, Rosemary Reid asserted that the true significance of the convention lay in the open communication among women, which she believed was essential for the growth of the women's movement. Reid expressed concern about media coverage sensationalising the issues discussed, suggesting that future conventions should operate without media attendance to encourage genuine dialogue and understanding among participants. Diane E. Roberts defended the convention's passionate discussions, arguing that heated debates were a sign of a vibrant movement. She disagreed with the notion that such dissent was unhealthy and emphasised the importance of addressing issues of oppression rather than maintaining the status quo. May Carrell voiced her disappointment in the perception that the convention was overly focused on animosity towards men. She believed many attendees had good relationships with men and found fulfilment in traditional roles such as home and family. Carrell warned against replacing one form of dominance with another, urging for recognition of oppressive behaviours regardless of gender. Robin Taylor, identifying as a male feminist, defended the presence of lesbian groups at the convention, comparing them to the suffragettes, who also faced criticism for not conforming to societal norms. He suggested that the exclusion of male reporters served as a lesson about the everyday experiences faced by women. Lastly, Elizabeth Martin praised the convention's organisation and described it as a rewarding experience. She acknowledged attempts to disrupt proceedings by younger activists but felt that the overall tone remained dignified, thanks to the leadership of the chairwoman and the emphasis on tolerance and understanding among women. Overall, the letters reveal a complex landscape of thoughts and criticisms surrounding the United Women’s Convention, reflecting both support for women's rights and concerns over how these issues are presented and addressed, particularly in relation to men and within the feminist movement itself.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand