Concern About Book (Press, 2 March 1977)

In a series of letters published in response to the controversial book “Down Under the Plum Trees” on 2 March 1977, various viewpoints emerged regarding its appropriateness and the state of youth in New Zealand. O. R. Knowles expressed concern for young people's behaviour, arguing that if they were more innocent and sensible, New Zealand could be a paradise. Knowles noted that young people engage in premarital sex, produce illegitimate offspring, explore homosexuality, and are involved in the spread of venereal diseases. He advocated for parents to face the realities of their children's lives and communicate openly with them, without moral judgement. He praised the authors and publishers of the book for their straightforward approach and suggested that it could be beneficial for parents and teachers who are aware of its significance. In contrast, A. J. and A. A. O'Sullivan condemned the book, labelling it “foul and filthy.” They argued that it is a grave reflection of societal decline that such material was even considered for educational use. They took issue with the book's perceived endorsement of behaviour such as sodomy, masturbation, and homosexuality, suggesting that it promotes criminal conduct and questioning the capabilities of educators to teach sexuality effectively. They also called out parents for their apparent apathy towards the current state of education regarding these issues. Additionally, P. Clements, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Concerned Parents' Association, expressed discontent over the book's availability to students. Clements argued that parents should be the ones to educate their children about sex and morality, rather than allowing external influences like schools or the authors of the book to impose their values. He emphasised the importance of regulations that govern educational material regarding family life and moral education, asserting that these should protect parental rights to uphold their teachings. Clements noted that, to date, the Department of Education had not established such regulations, which has been a point of concern for parents. Overall, the letters reflected a deep divide in public opinion regarding sexual education and the appropriateness of certain materials in the classroom, highlighting tensions between traditional values and the recognition of contemporary youth issues.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand