The General Election (Press, 13 November 1975)

The letters published on 13 November 1975 reflect diverse opinions on contemporary social and political issues, primarily surrounding the Labour government's welfare policies and the national political landscape. One correspondent, M. N. MacDonald, expressed disappointment about the newly announced motherhood allowance by Mr Rowling, arguing that increased taxes would burden single taxpayers like himself, hindering personal savings and home ownership. Another letter highlighted Jonathan Swift's perspectives on political deceit, drawing parallels with modern welfare proposals. Terence G. Cutler critiqued the political climate, suggesting that each party’s condemnation of one another's schemes only added to the confusion surrounding social welfare. M. E. Ritchie made a bold suggestion to alleviate the shortage of secondary teachers by lowering the school leaving age to 14 for those who pass certain examinations, arguing that many students would benefit more from entering the workforce or apprenticeships earlier. Penny Fenwick raised questions about the National Party’s manifesto, particularly regarding their proposal for free contraception, seeking clarification on the specific social and medical grounds that would warrant it. D. T. Archbold commented on the Labour Party’s optimistic manifesto, cautioning voters to be wary of their past unfulfilled promises, particularly in tackling inflation and supporting the agricultural sector, while N. Beck praised Rowling's government for attempting to maintain employment levels amidst a challenging economic backdrop. D. E. Chaston was sceptical of the Labour Party's new financial incentives for parenthood, arguing that this could exacerbate issues of overpopulation and suggesting that such policies ultimately disincentivise work and productivity. In contrast, another letter commended the government's focus on keeping people in work rather than resorting to welfare. Concerns about democratic integrity and manners were voiced by Helen Trew, who felt that the conduct at a National Party campaign event was unbecoming and detrimental to democracy. A. A. Leonard shared historical insights about the farming community's financial challenges, asserting that some issues predated Labour governance. Judith Nicholls questioned the concept of democracy in relation to the Women’s Electoral Lobby’s actions, while R. A. Smitham cynically remarked on election bribes, advocating for less frequent elections to temper disillusionment. M. Fields called for Members of Parliament to reside in their electorates, while P. R. H. Maling argued for the repeal of outdated anti-homosexual laws, criticising members of both main parties for their reluctance to embrace necessary changes that reflect evolving societal values. Overall, these letters encapsulate a vibrant public discourse reflecting the concerns, hopes, and criticisms of citizens grappling with the complexities of governance, welfare, education, and social justice in New Zealand during a politically charged era.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand