Letters To The Editor (Press, 29 October 1975)

On 29 October 1975, a summary of correspondence published revealed various opinions on political issues, church involvement, broadcasting costs, teaching practices, public transport behaviour, and animal welfare in New Zealand. The editor outlined guidelines for letter submissions, stating they must not exceed 150 words and require legible signatures and full addresses. Letters discussing political parties and the upcoming General Election were to be accepted only with real names. Several correspondents debated themes related to the election, including a response from Sandi Hall representing the Women’s Electoral Lobby (W.E.L.), who defended its activities against claims of frustration expressed by political commentators. Hall stated that the results of their regional scoring would be published soon, encouraging transparency. G. C. Suggate critiqued R. J. Hobbs for lacking a deep understanding of Christianity's teachings, particularly in relation to current political entities, while D. T. Archbold expressed concern over church leaders supporting a specific campaign, questioning their alignment with Christian principles. Furthermore, H. E. Menrath lamented the Labour Party's tactics against Mr Muldoon, calling for stronger governance as a means to resolve New Zealand's economic troubles. R. V. Shaw campaigned for a Citizens’ Tax to replace local rates, arguing that current rates unfairly burden certain householders, particularly pensioners. In regard to broadcasting, Veritas, a concerned correspondent, raised questions about salaries within the sector. The Director-General clarified some of these queries, alleviating concerns about broadcasting financial disparities. In education, correspondence highlighted confusion among parents regarding school workload definitions. Labour expressed hope for improved teaching standards to better inform students. Public transport issues were articulated by Garibaldi, who critiqued the behaviour of Christchurch bus drivers, calling their approach dangerous to cyclists and other road users. The Christchurch Transport Board acknowledged the complaint, encouraging specific incident reports for better accountability. Finally, concerns over sheep slaughter methods were raised by a correspondent, with a call for humane practices in line with industry standards, emphasizing the moral implications and potential international reputation risks regarding New Zealand’s meat industry. Overall, the letters illustrated a society engaged in critical conversations around governance, ethics, and community welfare during a politically charged period.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand