Dr Wall: No Attack On Free Speech (Press, 19 June 1975)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Dr Wall: No Attack On Free Speech (Press, 19 June 1975)
On 19 June 1975, Dr G. A. Wall, a Labour MP from Porirua, defended his controversial amendment to the Crimes Amendment Bill, which aims to legalise homosexual acts between consenting adult males. The amendment, however, proposes to make it illegal to suggest to individuals under 20 that homosexuality is normal. Dr Wall's remarks follow criticism from various members of the Labour Party, including David Shand, Roger Debreceni, and Judith Aitken, who contend that the amendment undermines freedom of speech, lacks a clear definition of what is deemed 'natural', and disregards factual evidence suggesting otherwise. Dr Wall expressed disappointment that critics did not accurately engage with the content of his amendment. He emphasised that the term 'natural' is not included in it and that the criticisms stem from a misunderstanding of its implications. He stated that the amendment would not restrict adult free speech and pointed out that society has always accepted some limitations on discourse directed at children. He argued that codifying this principle in law represents a continuation of customary social norms rather than a significant shift. Dr Wall also addressed concerns about the amendment's enforceability and the potential political ramifications for the Labour Party. He dismissed claims made by Shand that the amendment could adversely impact electoral performance, stating that homosexuality is not an official party policy issue and thus should not influence the party's standing with voters. He drew parallels to the late Norman Kirk's previous stances on the issue, suggesting the amendment would have no more impact than Kirk's outspoken positions. Overall, the amendment and Dr Wall's defence of it highlight an ongoing debate regarding legalising homosexuality and the limits of free speech, especially in relation to discussions with younger individuals.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand