‘Threat To Free Speech’ (Press, 13 June 1975)

A public meeting held at the University of Canterbury on 12 June 1975 condemned Dr G. A. Wall's proposed amendment to the Crimes Amendment Bill, arguing it infringed on free speech, a fundamental democratic right. Approximately 50 attendees voiced their concerns regarding the amendment, which makes it an offence to lead anyone under 20 to believe that homosexuality is normal, punishable by up to two years in prison. This would cover various forms of media, including books and films, although medical practitioners and clergy in a counselling capacity are exempt from these provisions. Critics described Dr Wall as someone who aligns with a discriminatory viewpoint that privileges heterosexuality over homosexuality. Trade unionist Mr P. Piesse voiced his opposition to the amendment, the bill, and existing legislation, echoing sentiments from Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau that the government should not interfere in the private lives of citizens. Mr K. Osborn, representing the Council of Civil Liberties, argued that the amendment threatened free speech and fell into the dangerous terrain of exacerbating prejudice against minorities. Clinical psychologist Mr R. Stanley highlighted that the amendment would violate ethical guidelines for his profession, stating it would compel professionals to choose between their duties to clients and adherence to the law. He described the amendment as poorly conceived, emphasising that homosexuality is just as normal for homosexuals as heterosexuality is for heterosexuals. The president of the University of Canterbury Students' Association, Mr P. Dunne, expressed concern over Dr Wall's presence in the Labour Party, suggesting that this was a point of embarrassment for the party, and mentioned that Dr Wall's focus should be on his constituents in Porirua rather than attacking the gay liberation movement. The Labour Youth Movement, represented by Miss Vicki Buck, also denounced the amendment, stressing that it contradicts the principles of democracy and egalitarianism foundational to the Labour Party, and recognised the attempt to restrict free speech as an unacceptable overreach.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand