Viewers’ Views (Press, 16 May 1975)

On 16 May 1975, a discussion surrounding the New Zealand television series "Close to Home" sparked various viewer reactions and critiques. A viewer raised a question about a specific moment in the episode where a character was seen listening to a horse race on a transistor radio, noting that the horses mentioned—Marinots, Champagne Lady, and Prepak—ran at Trentham two days earlier. The viewer wondered if the sound had been added post-production to create authenticity or if it was a coincidence. Producer Murray Reece clarified that the audio had been deliberately omitted during filming and included after the actual race on Saturday. Another viewer, Brian Edwards, commented on the controversial nature of the programme, suggesting that those who found it unsuitable should simply switch it off, arguing that the complaints often come from viewers who are overly sensitive or unselective about their viewing habits. He expressed frustration with the complaints being made about television content, implying that people should take personal responsibility for their choices. In another critique, Varian J. Wilson defended Dr. Edwards against accusations of disrespecting certain figures and groups on the show, claiming that the discussions on the show often exploit viewers’ sensibilities. He argued that the portrayal of issues related to homosexuality and indecency on television should not be tolerated and suggested that while the law should respect privacy, the nature of broadcasting makes such topics public rather than private. In a separate observation about the show “Country Calendar,” a viewer expressed disappointment with the current direction under a new producer. They felt the programme had shifted focus from rural issues to urban interests, losing its essence by not adequately addressing the needs of the rural community. They noted that significant topics, such as technological advancements in farming, were being overlooked. The viewer also hoped for improvements with the anticipated launch of an additional television channel, wondering about the future of former host John Whitwell. Overall, the criticisms reflect a larger conversation about television’s role in society, the responsibility of producers and viewers, and the importance of representing diverse perspectives while respecting audience sensitivities.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand