How Private Is A Member? (Press, 10 May 1975)

The opinion piece, published on 10 May 1975, presents a satirical overview of the political climate in Wellington as New Zealand approaches an election year. The author, using a whimsical tone, likens the uncertain political conditions to changing weather patterns, describing the atmosphere as foggy with hints of stormy weather ahead. This metaphor is employed to depict the unease among politicians as they navigate impending legislative challenges, particularly in light of the upcoming elections. With a focus on how politicians grapple with their responsibilities, the piece refers to the shivering members of parliament who are facing "Election 'Flu", implying that they are struggling to maintain their composure while the electorate watches closely. The author suggests that a range of Private Members Bills, including sensitive topics such as abortion and homosexual law reform, are being rushed through the legislative process, ostensibly to demonstrate a commitment to public concerns while masking true party agendas. The piece highlights the notion of free voting, where politicians have the liberty to vote according to their personal consciences rather than strict party lines. This is portrayed as a strategic move to avoid backlash from the public on controversial issues. The concerns about social reform are juxtaposed with the politicians' fear of losing votes, symbolised by their cautious approach to debated legislation and their reluctance to take definitive stands on contentious matters. In a cheeky manner, the author implies that the true intentions of legislators are often veiled by false sincerity and public posturing, critiquing their lack of genuine commitment to progressive causes. The article also comments on how the political manoeuvring is calculated, suggesting that parties are more concerned about winning elections than enacting meaningful change. Overall, the piece serves as a sharp critique of the electoral system and the behaviour of politicians during a highly charged political period. It cleverly conveys the idea that while some laws may seek reform, the underlying motivations of politicians often reflect self-preservation over genuine advocacy, all while the looming threat of the ballot box determines their fate.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand