Full Frontal Prudery (Press, 2 December 1974)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Full Frontal Prudery (Press, 2 December 1974)
On 2 December 1974, a series of letters to the editor appeared in "The Press" concerning an earlier article titled "Full frontal prudery." The article had sparked significant debate among readers, with some applauding its satirical approach, while others expressed strong disapproval. One letter, from a writer identified as G. S. O., praised John Collins for his satirical wit, suggesting that his contributions were among the finest seen in the newspaper for over a century. The writer referenced Sam Butler's historical warnings about societal decadence, implying that Collins' work was similarly critical of prevailing attitudes. Conversely, another correspondent, who signed off as "ALSO CONCERNED," countered the first letter by suggesting that the original critic with the “quasi-satirical outburst” was reacting defensively, indicating a possible jolt to their conscience. This writer believed the article had done more to promote understanding for the homosexual community than many petitions could achieve, calling for a response that prioritised justice without condemning either side. Another letter writer, J. Naber, expressed discontent with the article, which he believed was directed at Patricia Bartlett following her television interview. Naber accused the newspaper of failing to support those protecting children from perceived corruption and stated their intention to cancel their subscription due to the article's content. John W. Peters also submitted a letter criticising the publication of the article. He felt it mocked those who strive to uphold and enhance moral and spiritual standards, thereby silencing the "silent majority" who disapprove of immoral behaviour. Peters stated that he would align himself with the "prudes," emphasising his concern for the long-term effects of societal decadence. The editor concluded the correspondence by indicating that the discussion on the topic had reached its closure. This exchange reflects a significant divide in opinions on morality, humour, and social issues within the community at the time.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand