Homosexual Groups Have Different Approaches (Press, 19 September 1974)

On 19 September 1974, the Christchurch branch of the National Council of Women hosted a meeting featuring a talk by Mr Michael Waghorne, a sociologist who has researched homosexual groups for his M.A. degree. He discussed the homosexual law reform movement and highlighted the differences between two prominent groups: the Homosexual Law Reform Society (H.L.R.S) and the Gay Liberation Front. Mr Waghorne reflected on his initial misconceptions about these groups, stating that his prior knowledge was as limited as the general public's. Initially, he assumed both organisations shared the same objectives, but upon closer examination, he found they had distinct origins and approaches. The H.L.R.S. was founded in 1967, inspired by similar efforts in Britain where homosexual acts between consenting adults became legal that same year. This society was characterised by an open membership, welcoming anyone interested in joining. Mr Waghorne's own experience of attending an H.L.R.S. meeting was met with warmth and friendliness. In contrast, the Gay Liberation Front originated in the United States in 1969 following protests against police violence towards homosexuals after a violent incident that led to the death of a prominent homosexual figure. This group adopted a more radical approach and allied with other minority movements. Mr Waghorne noted that, in the New Zealand context, the Gay Liberation Front had taken a more radical stance compared to its American counterpart which had shifted toward a more moderate position after a split leading to the formation of the Gay Activist Alliance. The H.L.R.S., on the other hand, had a diverse membership base that included not only homosexuals but also notable figures such as bishops and educators, with no formal recognition required for membership. He elaborated on the H.L.R.S.'s efforts to reform laws and the challenges they faced with the Crimes Amendment Bill. The organisation aims to provide solidarity and support to individuals, fostering a sense of well-being through educational meetings, albeit often chaotic and light-heartedly chaotic. Mr Waghorne observed that the group also offered counselling and support services, often responding to referrals from church authorities. He indicated that their role was essential in preventing increased mental health referrals to facilities like Sunnyside Hospital. Despite their extensive work, Mr Waghorne pointed out that the H.L.R.S. had not effectively reached a broad segment of the public, unlike the more activist-oriented Gay Liberation Front, which garnered greater media attention. The H.L.R.S. acknowledged the importance of public education and was willing to engage with schools, albeit under certain conditions, such as only addressing senior students and allowing non-interested individuals to leave the room. Importantly, Mr Waghorne emphasised that the H.L.R.S. did not aim to alter anyone's sexual preferences but rather sought to foster understanding and educate the public about homosexuality.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

mike waghorne