AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Law Reform Supported (Press, 30 July 1974)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Law Reform Supported (Press, 30 July 1974)

On 29 July 1974, the National Party's conference in Auckland showed a significant level of support for homosexual law reform. However, it was noted that this endorsement did not equate to an acceptance of homosexual behaviour as normal. The discussions during the conference included some criticism of the Gay Liberation movement. The initial proposal aimed to change the law to legalise homosexual conduct between consenting adults in private. Nevertheless, an amendment was introduced to the proposal which specifically excluded any provisions regarding soliciting or advertising for homosexual purposes. This amendment was supported by Mr D. Harvey from the Young Nationals and Mr V. S. Young, who has previously sponsored a private member’s bill on the subject currently under consideration in the House. Mr Young clarified that the bill was independently his initiative, but he felt bolstered by the conference's backing following the amendment. Conversely, some party members expressed strong opposition to the remit. Mrs A. Reeves of Franklin notably argued against the proposal, asserting that society should not permit individuals she referred to as "deviates" to act freely. Mrs H. White from Waikato pointed out that the reform aimed to remove penalties associated with homosexual acts, thus providing an opportunity for rehabilitation rather than punishment. Another delegate, Mr M. J. O’Brien from Hamilton West, who had previously supported reform, shifted his stance and opposed any liberalisation of the law during the discussions. Despite the opposition voiced by several members, the amendment ultimately passed by a narrow margin, allowing for the main motion regarding law reform to proceed more smoothly thereafter.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:30th July 1974
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19740730_2_26.html