Homosexuality And Politics (Press, 10 July 1974)

Since 1967, consensual homosexual acts in private have been legal in the United Kingdom, which has not seen any significant rise in reported cases of homosexuality over the past seven years. This situation is attributed to the challenges in noting the incidence of these acts before they were decriminalised. With the legalisation, there has been a notable decrease in the harassment and blackmail of homosexual individuals, while lesbianism has remained legal in England. The move towards legal acceptance of homosexual behaviour has been viewed as a step towards achieving gender equality. Experts both in New Zealand and internationally are advocating for the legalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults. There is substantial medical, psychological, social, and legal support favouring the liberalisation of laws governing homosexual activity. New Zealand, historically recognised for its progressive social legislation, currently falls behind in terms of reform in this area. Prime Minister Mr Kirk acknowledged that a significant barrier to introducing a private member’s bill for law reform is the "deep division" within the Labour Party. The sentiment among homosexuals and reform advocates is one of frustration, as they had hoped for legislative progress following a narrow endorsement of reform by the Labour Party conference in 1971. Moreover, the National Party cannot expect support from the Gay Liberation Front after failing to introduce or commit to similar legislation following their endorsement at a conference three years prior to the 1973 General Election, which they lost. For both political parties to demonstrate genuine commitment to reform, they must find strategies to address the concerns of those within their ranks who oppose such changes. A petition to Parliament could provide a platform for shared accountability among parties on this issue. Statements citing "deep division" and suggesting that the current climate is not suitable for introducing reform are seen as evasive. It is asserted that governments have the responsibility to lead public opinion rather than simply follow it.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand