Film Censorship Hill Forwarded (Press, 30 March 1974)

On 30 March 1974, the New Zealand Film Censor, Mr D. C. Mclntosh, is set to travel overseas to study film censorship trends, as announced by the Minister of Internal Affairs, Mr May, during a parliamentary session introducing a Private Member’s Bill on film censorship proposed by Junior Government Whip, Mr J. L. Hunt. Mr May emphasised the need for Mr Mclntosh to be informed about recent significant changes in the field of film censorship. The proposed Cinematograph Amendment Bill introduces four classifications for film content. The existing classifications, “G” (General), “Y” (Suitable for young persons), and “A” (Adults only), will remain, albeit with a change in the age definition of adults from over 16 to over 18. The “Y” classification will permit screenings to adults and to younger viewers only if specified by the censor, whilst the “A” classification will restrict viewing strictly to adults. Importantly, the bill also introduces a new “N” classification, which denotes films that are not approved for exhibition. This classification applies to films that depict excessive and graphic cruelty, violence, crime, or sexual content, and that lack substantial artistic merit or importance. The bill specifies certain exemptions from censorship requirements, including technical, educational, and news films. It also allows films of artistic merit or social significance to be screened exclusively for members of approved film societies, or at film festivals run by these societies. Mr Hunt conveyed that his bill aimed to modernise film censorship for the 1970s. However, Mr D. A. Highet, the Opposition spokesperson on internal affairs, raised concerns regarding any potential rise in violence, pornography, or permissiveness in films, urging that such trends should be closely monitored. He stated that the Opposition could not support any legislation that might contribute to a decline in moral standards, although he clarified that his comments were not directed at Mr Hunt's bill. Highet acknowledged the desire for liberalisation among film societies, but highlighted the contrasting stance of others, specifically mentioning activist Miss Patricia Bartlett, who remains committed to upholding standards and curbing permissiveness and pornography in film content. Despite not being able to endorse Bartlett's proposals, Highet reiterated the Opposition's support for her concerns regarding the maintenance of moral standards in the film industry.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand