The Press Tuesday, September 4, 1973. A Fair... (Press, 4 September 1973)

Mary Whitehouse, an English campaigner known for her opposition to violent and sexual content in media, is set to visit New Zealand next month. Her visit is anticipated to prompt a mix of applause and criticism, largely derived from her past actions in Britain rather than her statements during the trip. There is a risk that some may dismiss her, likening her to Patricia Bartlett, without fully understanding the intent and impact of their arguments regarding censorship. The discourse surrounding censorship and its implications on the arts is complex, with rational points on both sides that merit discussion. Whitehouse’s position in Britain has gained significant public support, with millions signing petitions against what she terms “moral pollution,” indicating a widespread concern among citizens regarding the potential negative impact of certain media portrayals. This raises questions about the influence of visual content on individual behaviour, particularly when linked to serious crimes such as rape and murder. While there is acknowledgment that many viewers are unaffected by films like “A Clockwork Orange,” there exists a body of evidence that suggests media can incite violent actions. In New Zealand, society appears to be increasingly accepting of explicit representations of sexual deviance and violence, framed as artistic freedom. However, this acceptance often leads to those who raise concerns being branded as outdated or politically repressive. A recent article in the magazine “Encounter” discussed the backlash faced by advocates for public morality in Britain, hinting at a growing intolerance towards discussions on the need for standards in media representation. This sentiment raises the possibility that similar trends may emerge in New Zealand. It is essential to clarify that the discussion around censorship is not an outright endorsement of Whitehouse or Bartlett's views; rather, it is crucial to consider the evidence they present. Critics of pornography often lack robust evidence, but there are instances where media can be linked to real-life violence. The ongoing debate must grapple with the difficult balance between artistic freedom and societal impact, particularly in light of potential crimes influenced by media. Furthermore, the current trend in opposing censorship appears to come with an overwhelming confidence in the correctness of its stance, which may stifle consideration of alternative viewpoints. The fear is that this liberal movement may inadvertently advocate for illiberal practices, particularly when dissenting opinions are silenced. Ultimately, one of the fundamental questions in this debate remains unresolved: if media can have positive effects on audiences, why are its potential negative impacts so readily dismissed? Until a comprehensive framework addressing these concerns is established, Whitehouse and her supporters warrant serious consideration and discussion within the New Zealand context. Acknowledging that a community should accept both the benefits and detriments of media is crucial, as is recognising that detrimental effects do exist.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand