Tape Recording Of Film Appeal Hearing Banned (Press, 31 July 1973)

On 30 July 1973, a hearing took place in Wellington regarding an appeal against the Censor's decision to ban the film "Last Tango in Paris." The Cinematograph Films Censorship Board of Appeal, chaired by Mr. W. H. Carson, excluded a tape recording of the morning session's evidence, stating it did not conform to general proceedings. Miss Patricia Bartlett, who had been recording, claimed she received verbal permission from the appeal board's secretary to use her tape recorder, believing she had a right to do so since she couldn't take shorthand notes. The appeal was brought forth by United Artists (Australasia) Pty, Ltd., represented by counsel Mr. L. Brown, Q.C., and Mr. M. B. Williams. The Solicitor-General, Mr. R. C. Savage, appeared as amicus curiae, presenting arguments against the film's release. Mr. Brown argued for lifting the ban, asserting that the film was a significant work of art with integrity, and that its ability to provoke offence and shock was legitimate within cinematic expression. He acknowledged the film's explicit content but contended it served the context appropriately, expressing disbelief that it could be seen as merely titillating. Richard McClure, New Zealand manager for United Artists, stated that he would accept the film being released with a stringent warning to audiences, similar to those given for other controversial films like "The Devils" the previous year. The distributor called upon five witnesses to support the appeal, including media professionals and a representative from the Presbyterian Church, each affirming the film’s artistic value. Conversely, Mr. Savage argued strongly for the censor’s ban, describing the film's language and imagery as gross and unsuitable for public viewing. He portrayed the sexual relationship depicted in "Last Tango in Paris" as brutal and devoid of tenderness, suggesting it would negatively influence societal morals. He warned that the film could attract viewers beyond merely discerning audiences, which raised significant public interest concerns. The board ultimately reserved its decision on the appeal, leaving the final outcome uncertain.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand