E. M. Forster’s Delayed Novel (Press, 29 January 1972)

The review discusses E. M. Forster's novel "Maurice," which he began writing in 1913 but was published posthumously in 1971. Notably, the book was groundbreaking for its direct approach to homosexuality at a time when such topics were not openly acknowledged, and Forster adds a "Terminal Note" to reflect on its historical context. Set against the progress of the 1960s and the growing acceptance of LGBTQ+ themes, the review suggests that the novel may now feel somewhat dated and less impactful, as the need for tolerance advocacy has evolved. While acknowledging Forster's courage in tackling the subject matter, the reviewer criticises the novel for its oversimplified characters and narrative. The author suggests that Forster's involvement in the story's moral message compromises the emotional depth and realism of the characters—Maurice is depicted as a one-dimensional figure rather than a fully developed protagonist. The reviewer draws parallels to D. H. Lawrence's "Lady Chatterley’s Lover," noting the thematic similarities in the protagonists' journeys toward self-awareness and love. The story revolves around Maurice, a young Englishman grappling with his sexual identity, and his relationship with Alec Scudder, a gamekeeper. Forster's insistence on a happy ending is highlighted, though it has been met with skepticism from contemporary readers. Critics, including Lytton Strachey, question the longevity and authenticity of Maurice and Alec's relationship, leading the reviewer to agree that the resolution feels forced and lacks credibility. The review points out that Forster's portrayal of Maurice lacks the persuasive characterisation and plot development seen in his other works. Maurice's eventual awakening, intended to symbolize personal growth and connection, appears artificial due to the author's overt presence in the narrative. This emphasis on a happy conclusion sacrifices the complexity and irony that characterise Forster's other stories. Despite these criticisms, the review acknowledges that "Maurice" brings forth valuable themes and language reflective of Forster's talent. The novel serves as a reminder of qualities like "nobility" and "comradeship," which seem quaint in the context of post-war society. The most compelling moment in the narrative occurs when Maurice, faced with despair, chooses life and grapples with his human dignity despite lacking external motivations, illustrating Forster's belief in the inherent heroism of the human condition. In summary, while "Maurice" has its flaws and may read sentimentally, it remains a significant work for its exploration of themes previously neglected in literature and reflects Forster's abilities to connect with deeper human experiences, despite its ultimate lack of narrative cohesion. The review underscores the impact of social change on literary themes and narratives, noting how the ideals of the Edwardian era can still resonate today.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand