AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

'Rebuff’ To Law Reformers (Press, 5 August 1971)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: 'Rebuff’ To Law Reformers (Press, 5 August 1971)

The Cabinet and caucus of New Zealand's Government have decided not to reform the law that prohibits homosexual acts between consenting adult men in private. This decision is being interpreted by the Homosexual Law Reform Society as a failure to respond to shifting public sentiment. Professor J. H. Robb, the president of the society, remarked on the Prime Minister Sir Keith Holyoake's comments at the Young Nationalists' conference in Dunedin, indicating that this stance represents a setback for younger members of the National Party who previously advocated for changes in party policy regarding this issue. The younger party members seek social justice, arguing that granting equality before the law to the estimated 45,000 to 50,000 homosexual men in New Zealand would not harm the wider community. Professor Robb noted that the Government's choice appears to disregard the views of several religious groups, including the Methodist and Presbyterian Churches, the Associated Churches of Christ, the Quakers, and certain influential voices within the Anglican community. Support for legal reform also comes from organisations such as the Jaycees and the Council for Civil Liberties, suggesting a substantial base of responsible opinion in favour of change. Professor Robb highlighted the inconsistency in the Prime Minister’s position, pointing out that Sir Keith had previously acknowledged a shift in public opinion on the matter. This inconsistency raises questions about the rationale behind the Government’s decision, as expressed by the Prime Minister’s uncertain affirmation that the decision was made “wisely or not.”

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:5th August 1971
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19710805_2_17.html