Law Change Sought Labour Vote On Homosexuality (Press, 26 May 1971)

At the Labour Party's national conference held on 25 May 1971, a significant decision was made regarding the recommendations of the Wolfenden Report on Homosexuality. Despite an initial recommendation from the conference’s justice committee to reject the remit, it was ultimately approved by a card vote of 274 in favour to 259 against. Dr A. M. Finlay, the chairman of the committee and a member of Parliament, stated that the key recommendation from the Wolfenden Report was that homosexual acts between consenting adults in private should not be considered crimes. He clarified that he voted in favour of accepting the remit despite his committee's recommendation. During the discussions, some members raised concerns about adopting the report without scrutinising its implications for New Zealand. Mr R. F. Dillon proposed that the Parliamentary Labour Party investigate the report further before making any decisions. His suggestion was not supported by the conference. Other delegates highlighted the existing legislation as being rooted in prejudice and discrimination against minority groups. In another significant topic of discussion, the conference agreed that the Labour Party, if elected to Government, would conduct a committee of inquiry into cannabis use. The aim of this inquiry would be to gather better information regarding necessary legal reforms related to drug usage, although an amendment to tie the inquiry explicitly to reforming the law was rejected. Some younger delegates voiced strong opposition to the current laws governing drug use, while others argued for a nuanced approach that would consider the perspectives of those under 25, as they may have different views influenced by contemporary society. Dr Finlay addressed claims regarding the non-addictiveness of cannabis, stating that the anecdotal evidence presented was mere opinion rather than conclusive proof. He expressed his agreement that it was improper to categorize marijuana alongside hard drugs and endorsed the idea of the inquiry, which received backing from the conference attendees. Additionally, a remit that suggested abolishing the Security Intelligence Service was firmly rejected during the conference. Despite arguments that the service was more harmful than beneficial, particularly in stifling communication of ideas, delegates decided against endorsing its abolition. Dr Finlay contended that the necessity of a security service remains relevant in today’s society, implying that without it, a similar entity would be required. Overall, the conference showcased a progressive stance on issues of homosexuality and drug inquiry, reflecting a shift in attitudes within the Labour Party, while also highlighting the challenges of balancing reform with public and political sentiments.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand