This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Viewers’ Views (Press, 2 July 1970)
A series of letters published on 2 July 1970 reflect diverse opinions on the appropriateness of television programming for children, particularly in relation to a film titled "The Loudest Whisper." One letter writer, identifying as "Mother of Two Teen-Agers" from Ashburton, expresses surprise that another correspondent, "Anxious Mother," would permit children to watch television until the late hour of 11.13 p.m. This writer argues that the topics presented in "The Loudest Whisper" are already discussed among children aged 12 to 14 and believes that adults should not be restricted in their viewing options simply due to another parent's apprehension. The letter also touches upon the idea that it is unrealistic and potentially harmful to shield children from certain realities, asserting that overprotectiveness can deny important discussions about subjects like sexuality. The writer posits that responsible adults should teach their children about such topics in an age-appropriate manner rather than imposing strict viewing restrictions. Another letter comes from a group identified as "Healthy-Minded Children" from Rangiora, who suggest that "Anxious Mother" and Sandy Laidlaw are being unreasonable for expecting only family-friendly programmes at an early hour. They argue that some adults appreciate later screenings of meaningful films such as "The Loudest Whisper," and they question the idea that children should be sheltered from certain themes presented in artistic works. "Anxious Mother" herself responds, indicating that she had used the off button before the film started because she had already seen it previously, suggesting she understands the film's content. She also mentions that her daughter's friends in the 12 to 14 age group found the film enjoyable, countering the notion that it is inappropriate for young viewers. The exchange highlights an ongoing debate about the content that should be available to children on television, with varying perspectives on parental control, societal values, and the role of education in helping children navigate complex subjects depicted in media. It also raises questions about censorship and the responsibilities of both parents and broadcasters in determining what is suitable for young audiences.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand