Homosexuality Law Change Backed (Press, 2 November 1968)

On 1 November 1968, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of New Zealand convened in Auckland, where they discussed their stance on current legislative proposals regarding homosexuality. The assembly expressed support for the proposed changes, with Mr Jenkins articulating that while many adult males might engage in homosexual acts, it does not necessarily classify them as homosexuals. He emphasised the inappropriate nature of allowing societal pressures towards homosexuality to thrive. Mr R. T. Feist, the convener of the public questions committee, referenced Justice Department statistics indicating that 4 per cent of adult males in New Zealand identified as exclusively homosexual. He asserted the need to accept these individuals while also advocating for interventions that would help them manage their homosexual tendencies, suggesting that legal reforms could encourage individuals to seek assistance without the fear of legal repercussions. The Rev. L. H. Jenkins acknowledged Feist’s sentiments but argued for a distinction between true homosexuals and those who merely engage in homosexual acts, labelling such actions as a deviation from divine intention and a violation of the human body. He called for proper education regarding homosexuality to better understand the issue. The Rev. D. C. Mence shared his experiences, noting that during his time in a previous parish, he had encountered numerous homosexuals, many of whom had faced threats of blackmail. He contended that the Church's endorsement of the proposals before Parliament would alleviate some of the fear these individuals experienced about their personal lives and the potential impact on their happiness and family stability. Conversely, the Rev. A. G. Gunn opposed the motion, claiming that approval would tarnish the Church’s reputation among ethical individuals by asserting that homosexuals were not inherently predisposed but rather sought such behaviours for thrill. The Rev. R. J. Blaikie added to the discussion, stating that while there were genuine homosexuals, many do not engage in sexual acts, reiterating that the Church’s general stance is against sexual conduct outside of marriage, hence analogous expectations should apply to homosexuals as well. Overall, the assembly's debate highlighted the complexities and differing opinions within the Church regarding homosexuality, underscoring the need for a nuanced conversation on the subject as it related to morality, legality, and support for individuals identified as homosexuals.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand