Homosexual Charges (Press, 24 July 1967)

A series of letters published in response to the decision of Magistrate H. J. Evans to discharge without conviction two men charged with homosexual acts has sparked debate on issues of legality, morality, and societal attitudes towards homosexuality in New Zealand. The first letter, from Varian J. Wilson, expresses support for the decision but criticises the lengthy address given by the magistrate, which he felt was irrelevant and failed to provide sufficient facts for public consideration. Wilson points out that the private nature of the acts is questionable, especially when they resulted in police involvement over financial disputes that hinted at blackmail. He draws a parallel to female prostitution, suggesting that similar acts would not be condoned if held under public scrutiny. In a subsequent letter, another writer commends Evans for his judgement, acknowledging that while New Zealand's criminal code still imposes heavy penalties for homosexual acts, the recent legislative developments in England towards legalising homosexual relations between consenting males in private reflects a shift in societal attitudes. The writer deems Evans' decision as courageous, considering the significant public opinion in favour of change. Contrarily, another correspondent criticises the magistrate's decision for conforming to external influences rather than fostering local progress on such moral issues. This writer compares New Zealand’s tendency to replicate British attitudes to that of a farm, suggesting that the country should aspire toward more independent and progressive legal and social reforms rather than following in the footsteps of Britain. They express concern that while British legislation may suggest a form of consent, it may overlook the complexities and potential consequences surrounding such consent in practice. Overall, the exchange reflects a complex dialogue about the intersection of law, private behaviour, and broader societal values regarding sexuality during a time of evolving attitudes toward homosexuality. The letters underline the struggle between upholding existing legal frameworks and the push for more modern, humane perspectives on personal relationships, emphasising the need for reflection on New Zealand’s own legal identity apart from colonial influences.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand