Homosexual Law (Press, 15 June 1967)

On 15 June 1967, a series of letters were published in response to discussions surrounding homosexuality and the law in New Zealand. R.C. Stewart pointed out the apparent injustice of existing laws, noting that while female homosexuals faced little legal restraint, male homosexuals were treated as criminals. He suggested that this disparity stemmed from personal prejudice and a lack of compassion among law enforcement, and called for a more enlightened approach from reformers and church leaders. J.M. Tanner contended that societal measures aimed at banishing homosexuals would not reduce their numbers and argued that the underground existence of homosexuality, often linked to prostitution, indicates that ignorance and fear only exacerbate the issue. Tanner compared the treatment of homosexuals to the historical mistreatment of the mentally ill, suggesting that a more enlightened attitude is necessary. In another letter, D. Rae defended the talks by Mr Gordon to the Lions Club, which aimed to inform the public about homosexuality. Rae criticised those who attacked Gordon for failing to tackle other societal issues during his address, stating that focusing on homosexuality specifically was valid. Rae provocatively suggested that if homosexuality is considered a disease, there should be legal provisions for it to be treated as such. T.M. Shaw, on the other hand, labelled homosexuals as moral perverts and expressed a belief that they should be cured or punished, reinforcing a more punitive view. Furthermore, Varian J. Wilson raised concerns about the reformers' approaches, arguing that placing the age of consent for homosexuals at 21 recognised homosexual relationships as crimes in the eyes of society. He emphasised the need for legal protection for vulnerable individuals regardless of sexual orientation. Phred questioned the misconception that lifting laws against homosexuality would lead to an increase in its prevalence, insisting that a significant number of homosexuals desire to change their orientation. Another correspondent, signing off as “DISGUSTED,” expressed disdain for the sympathy extended towards homosexuals, invoking biblical references to condemn their behaviour. A.B. Cedarian highlighted a concern that proposed legal reforms could portray New Zealand as a nation that condones homosexuality, an image they believe should be avoided—prioritising the self-interest of society over the plight of homosexuals. Finally, one writer called for investigations into the root causes of homosexuality, advocating for a compassionate approach separate from judgment. The letters collectively reflect a spectrum of opinions, ranging from calls for reform and understanding to vehement opposition and insistence on the moral responsibilities of society.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand