Homosexual Law (Press, 13 June 1967)

In a series of letters to the editor, various individuals express their views regarding comments made by Detective Superintendent F.A. Gordon on issues surrounding indecency and homosexuality in New Zealand, particularly in light of complaints the police face when investigating these matters. One writer, Varian J. Wilson, agrees with Gordon's remarks, advocating for continued penal reform and increased treatment opportunities, while emphasising the need for law enforcement to first address apprehended individuals suspected of perversion. Wilson notes that there were no homosexuals in New Zealand prisons for offences involving adults at the time, suggesting that reforms are not addressing behaviour he deems harmful to society. In contrast, another correspondent, Carolus Le Heux, invokes biblical scripture, arguing that the moral framework provided by faith condemns homosexuality as a sin but offers forgiveness for those who repent. Le Heux seems to call for a more reverent discussion grounded in religious belief, hinting that a moral decline leads to social degradation. A letter from an anonymous writer labelled as “Graduate” raises concerns about the implications of Gordon's and the police's stance on fairness and prejudice in administrative practices. They argue that current laws prevent individuals convicted of homosexual acts from holding public office or serving in the public sector, which restricts any possibility of reforming these laws from within. This writer suggests that the exclusionary practices in legislation indicate a bias that necessitates scrutiny. A final letter, signed by “Grateful Mother,” sends support towards Detective Superintendent Gordon's efforts. The writer expresses concern over the potential normalisation of homosexuality and its perceived dangers to the health of future generations. They argue that the promotion of homosexual rights would lead to societal decay and advocate rallying behind Gordon in his mission to protect the well-being of youth. Overall, the correspondence reflects a deep divide in societal views on homosexuality, revealing a struggle between reformist perspectives and traditional moral objections during a time of evolving attitudes concerning sexual orientation and indecency laws in New Zealand in 1967.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand