Homosexual Law (Press, 9 June 1967)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law (Press, 9 June 1967)
On 9 June 1967, a series of letters were published in response to comments made by Detective Superintendent F. A. Gordon regarding homosexuality laws in New Zealand. Gordon defended the current laws, suggesting that repealing them would lead to societal decay, describing it as becoming "a nation of queers." Critics, including Michael B. Jameson and Jan Farr, expressed their disapproval of Gordon's remarks, arguing that the existing laws contribute to significant societal issues, including suicide and blackmail. Jameson specifically highlighted the lack of legal restrictions on female homosexuals compared to their male counterparts and noted the absence of support for unmarried mothers abandoned by their partners. Farr, in her response, voiced her preference for abstaining from societal issues rather than aligning herself with Gordon's views, which she found limiting. Another correspondent, identifying as "Graduate," critiqued Gordon’s remarks as indicative of ignorance and prejudice. This letter called into question the neutrality of police administration considering Gordon's vocal opposition to male homosexuality without addressing female homosexuality, suggesting a double standard. In response to the critical letters, Gordon maintained his stance, stating that the correspondents were entitled to their opinions just as he was to his. He claimed to be well-read on the subject, including the Wolfenden Report, which has received acclaim for advocating a more progressive stance on homosexuality. Gordon asserted his long experience in law enforcement had given him insight into the societal troubles associated with what he termed "the pervert," while he considered non-offending homosexuals as innocuous and worthy of sympathy. He concluded by emphasising his primary concern for the well-being of the youth.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand