“Ulysses” (Press, 3 May 1967)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: “Ulysses” (Press, 3 May 1967)
On 3 May 1967, various letters were published expressing concerns and criticisms regarding the film "Ulysses," which was subject to censorship and segregation of audiences by sex. The correspondence highlights the absurdity of the film censor’s claims that extreme emotional responses evoked by the film could not be shared between men and women in a cinema setting. One letter from Graham Riley questions what specific human emotion is so problematic that it cannot be experienced together in the dark, implying that the censor’s stance reflects an unusual perspective that may not resonate with traditional heterosexual experiences. He sarcastically wonders if attending the film would lead to assumptions about his sexual orientation. Another letter, attributed to a "Father of Six," inquires about practical matters regarding audience segregation, such as toilet facilities for women in a theatre predominantly filled with men and how the authorities would differentiate between the sexes given that many males may have long hair that could appear feminine. This highlights a concern about the logistics and fairness of enforcing such segregation. Lastly, a writer using the pseudonym Sartor Resartus raises further questions about the implications of enforced separation, questioning how authorities could ensure that those sitting next to one another are not homosexual, thereby continuing the discourse on the complexities and prejudices behind the film's censorship and the societal anxieties surrounding sexuality. The letters reflect a blend of humour, frustration, and societal critique regarding the restrictions placed on cinema audiences at the time.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand