AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Guilt (Press, 21 July 1962)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Guilt (Press, 21 July 1962)

On 21 July 1962, a review was published for the book "Guilt, its meaning and significance" by John G. McKenzie. The author, who had a notable career as a Professor of Social Science and Psychology at Paton College in Nottingham, England, draws from his extensive experience in writing about human issues faced by individuals across the spectrum of society. His weekly writings are widely read throughout the Commonwealth, attesting to his resonance with readers on matters of psychological impact. The review highlights that this new work is a significant contribution to psychological discourse, focusing on the concept of guilt, which is a universal experience among humans. It emphasises the debilitating nature of guilt, suggesting it underlies many psychological issues encountered in practice. As mental illness becomes increasingly prevalent, McKenzie argues for the need to understand and address the inhibitive role of guilt in therapy. McKenzie differentiates between objective guilt, which is addressed predominantly by the legal system—where an individual may be deemed not responsible for their inherent condition, yet accountable for their actions—and subjective guilt, which poses a challenge for psychologists and theologians alike. The author underscores the difficulty psychiatrists face when providing testimonies in legal contexts, noting the complex nature of impulsive actions leading to crimes. He critiques existing legal frameworks, particularly the McNaghten Rules, implying that they fall short in dealing with the nuances of uncontrollable impulses following a crime. The interplay of law, ethics, and theology regarding guilt is a central concern of the book. McKenzie bases his arguments on extensive reading and personal case studies, deepening the reader's understanding of the psychological burden of guilt. He particularly shines when addressing the intersection of religion and guilt. Having tutored numerous divinity students, McKenzie articulates the profound emotional struggles associated with personal guilt and the desire for forgiveness. He notes the difficulty individuals have in forgiving themselves, despite seeking pardons for their transgressions. The author posits that while sins may leave lasting effects, spiritual restoration can alleviate the burden of guilt. The review concludes by noting that McKenzie’s work is valuable and engaging, making it accessible even to readers unfamiliar with psychological terminology. Each chapter includes curated reading lists, further aiding readers in exploring the complexities surrounding guilt. Overall, "Guilt, its meaning and significance" is presented as an insightful exploration that will interest various practitioners and scholars in the fields of psychology and theology.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:21st July 1962
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19620721_2_13.html