AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Liberace Brings Libel Action (Press, 10 June 1959)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Liberace Brings Libel Action (Press, 10 June 1959)

On 9 June 1959, American pianist Liberace, known for his extravagant attire, continued his libel suit against the British newspaper "Daily Mirror" and its columnist, William Connor, also known as "Cassandra." The case stems from two articles published in 1956, which Liberace claims were malicious and implied that he was homosexual. The "Daily Mirror" defended its articles by asserting that the statements were true and represented fair comment. Liberace's counsel, Gilbert Beyfus, Q.C., argued that one article presented an inference that Liberace was a homosexual, citing phrases that described him as “the summit of sex” and “the biggest sentimental vomit of all time.” Liberace strongly denied these allegations while on the witness stand, stating that the claims caused him and his family significant distress, particularly his mother, who was so upset that she left England. During the trial, Liberace shared details about his popularity, including having over 200 fan clubs in America, receiving thousands of letters weekly, and earning an impressive income. He also mentioned how the alleged statements in the newspaper articles led to derogatory shouts from audiences at his performances in the UK. The defence included a claim that Liberace had made a disparaging remark about Princess Margaret in a previous television interview, which was cited as part of the case against him. However, Liberace clarified that his remarks were not intended to be inappropriate. His counsel argued that the articles published by Connor were a personal attack on Liberace's character and reputation, framing him not as a mere entertainer but as a victim of a “literary assassin” whose goal was to damage reputations for sensational readership. As the proceedings continued, it was evident that the case was not just about defamation but also about the broader implications of public perception and personal integrity in the face of public scrutiny. The trial would resume the next day as both parties prepared to continue presenting their arguments.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:10th June 1959
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19590610_2_129.html