Murder Charge (Press, 27 August 1954)

The trial of Pauline Parker, 16, and Juliet Hulme, nearly 16, accused of murdering Parker's mother, Honora Mary Parker, on June 22, 1954, continued with a five-day hearing at the Supreme Court. The defence introduced expert testimony from several psychiatrists who posited that the girls were suffering from a shared condition known as "folie à deux" or mutual insanity. The defence's first witness, Dr. R.W. Medlicott, was subjected to extensive cross-examination by Crown Prosecutor Mr. A.W. Brown, which lasted for hours. Public interest in the trial grew significantly, as evidenced by a full court with many eager attendees trying to secure seats to witness the hearings. Dr. Medlicott described the girls' diaries, noting that they contained fictional characters used by the girls to express their thoughts and feelings. When pressed about the interpretation of certain entries, he acknowledged that while the girls used film stars' names as characters, their representations might have included romantic and possibly sexual undertones. As the testimony progressed, Dr. F.O. Bennett was called to support the defence's claim of insanity. He corroborated Dr. Medlicott's observations, stating that both girls demonstrated delusions of grandeur and felt superior to others. In his view, their relationship had morphed into a severe mental illness over time, which included elements of paranoia and a warped sense of morality leading to their violent act. Bennett discussed the girls' diaries, which revealed a growing separation from reality and a deepening delusional state. The evidence presented painted a troubling picture: the girls had isolated themselves from societal values, ultimately leading them to justify their plan to kill Parker's mother under the belief that it would free both them and her from an unhappy existence. Despite their defence arguing that the girls were insane and did not truly understand the nature or the wrongness of their acts, the numerous references to their calculated planning and lack of remorse following the murder suggested otherwise. These two young girls had meticulously detailed their intentions in their diaries, which were injected with themes of violence and a belief that they were acting within a justified framework. The complexities of their mental state and the implications of their written words became crucial elements for the jury to consider in their final deliberation on the matter of sanity at the time of the crime. Dr. Bennett concluded that although they were aware of the legal implications of their actions, they were driven by their loyalty to their delusions, which essentially nullified the moral judgments that typically guide sane individuals. The trial continued as the court sought to untangle the intricate web of motivations and mental states that led to this tragic event.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand