Passage Through Committee. (Press, 12 November 1910)

On 11 November 1910, discussions in the Wellington House of Representatives highlighted intense debate regarding the Licensing Bill, particularly Clause 16, which pertained to national prohibition. Mr Malcolm expressed his belief that a 50 percent majority should suffice for implementing prohibition, claiming that the Bill too heavily favoured the alcohol trade. Conversely, some members, including Sir Joseph Ward, disputed Malcolm's assertions, stating that they were contrary to the facts. Several members, including Mr Taylor, sought amendments to ensure that national prohibition would require a majority of votes from all valid licensing polls, arguing that a bare majority could undermine the democratic process. Mr Wright was also critical of the three-fifths majority requirement for local options, advocating instead for equal voting rights where every single vote should hold equal weight. Discussions also saw voices against the principle of prohibition. Mr Bollard, for instance, defended moderation over outright prohibition, claiming that such measures would result in the oppression of citizens. The Prime Minister questioned the historical effectiveness of previous licensing laws, and Mr Russell pinpointed concerns about imposing different majority requirements based on the type of voting (local versus national), suggesting that localised license laws should remain. Amid these discussions, a crucial amendment was voted on, with the Prime Minister's change to replace the 55 percent clause with a three-fifths majority gaining approval by a margin of 50 to 25 votes. Additionally, a clause was introduced to prevent brewery depots within proximity to no-license districts, which included an exception for existing bottling warehouses. The session further included discussions surrounding potential voting rights for European electors in the King Country, where a proposal for a three-fifths majority to grant licenses was ultimately rejected. Meanwhile, representatives such as Mr Horsford and Mr Fisher pushed for new clauses to empower constables in enforcing liquor laws and to restrict certain landlord-tenant agreements concerning licensed premises. The Prime Minister's commitment to ensuring the Bill was scrutinised ahead of its final reading was evident, with suggestions to circulate amendments for review. As discussions wrapped up, the Bill was reported with the amendments made, signalling continued deliberations on a topic that sparked considerable contention among representatives concerned about public sentiment, the influence of the alcohol trade, and the principles of democracy. The House rose early on the morning of 12 November 1910, reflecting the long hours devoted to this critical piece of legislation.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand