Magisterial. (Press, 1 May 1886)

On 1 May 1886, a court case involving Amy Bock, also known as Lydia, took place in Christchurch. She pleaded guilty to obtaining goods valued at £7 9s 10d from G. L. Beath and Co. under false pretences. On 15 April, Bock visited the shop, claiming credit based on a list of apparel she wanted. During the conversation, she mentioned Mr Whitefoord, leading the store to believe she had his endorsement for payment. After securing the goods, she left for Wellington, prompting the company to investigate, which resulted in her arrest. In her defence, her legal representative, Mr Joyce, presented character references from Mr Maxell, who had employed her as a governess for eight months. He attested to her respectable background, stating she was a certified teacher from Victoria, who had come to New Zealand for health reasons after overworking herself and experiencing a long illness. Maxell noted that her recent behaviour seemed erratic and that she had become obsessed with possessing a large fortune. The inspector indicated there might be other unpaid transactions attributed to her. Mr Joyce made a persuasive plea for leniency, arguing that Bock's actions were not criminally motivated but rather the result of her mental health issues. He suggested a light sentence of imprisonment until the court adjourned. However, the judges, acknowledging the seriousness of the case, decided against dismissal and instead sentenced Bock to one month of hard labour in prison. In other cases, George Henry Cook was sentenced to one month of hard labour for stealing earrings valued at 6s. Joseph and William Whitford, both young boys, were charged with stealing utensils, admitted to taking one, received a caution, and were discharged. Additionally, several civil claims were addressed, including a case related to damages caused by fire, where judgement was deferred, and others where claims were dismissed. Towards the end of the court session, a case involving Mr Agar and Mr Austin, both accused of offensive behaviour on a boat, was discussed. The incident involved a quarrel and use of inappropriate language. The magistrate dismissed most charges against them but imposed a sentence for obscenity, requiring imprisonment until the court rose, while warning them of harsher consequences for any future misconduct. Throughout the session, various other claims were settled, including one concerning nursing services, where compensation was granted to the plaintiff. Overall, the court addressed multiple criminal and civil issues, reflecting a busy day in the legal system of Christchurch in 1886.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand