AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Supreme Court. (Press, 13 October 1874)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Supreme Court. (Press, 13 October 1874)

On 12 October 1874, criminal proceedings resumed in the Supreme Court before Mr Justice Greson. The main case involved Frederick Peiper and George Doig, who were indicted for stealing thirty-seven boxes of soap that were held under the custody of Richard Walton, the provisional trustee in bankruptcy for Hugh Andrews’ estate. Both defendants pleaded "Not Guilty," with lawyer Mr Joynt defending Peiper and Mr Duncan representing the Crown. The case's background revealed that Hugh Andrews, previously a soap and candle manufacturer, had declared insolvency on 4 August 1874, leading to his adjudication as bankrupt. Walton, as the trustee, appointed bailiff Charles John Dunnage to oversee the assets, including 121 boxes of soap, which went missing around 15 August. Upon notification to the police, Chief-Detective Feast investigated the premises and suspected theft. Detective Feast subsequently searched Peiper's property but found no stolen goods. However, acting on further information, he searched Thomas Wilson's tannery in Heathcote, discovering thirty-six boxes of soap matching the stolen items' description. Peiper was arrested, while Doig was apprehended later on the charge of being an accessory to the crime. Doig initially claimed to have seen the stolen soap at Peiper's stable and then testified that Peiper instructed him to retrieve the soap using a dray, which he did, along with a carter named Jeffreys. During the trial, Mr Duncan provided evidence, including the declaration of insolvency and corroborating testimony from Chief-Detective Feast, other detectives, and witnesses involved in the case. One witness testified that Peiper had attempted to solicit him for advice on acquiring additional stolen soap discreetly. Another witness, Jeffrey, confirmed he delivered the soap to Wilson's tannery under Doig's direction. After presenting the evidence, Mr Joynt, representing Peiper, indicated he would not call any witnesses for the defence. The judge directed the jury to consider the lack of evidence against Doig, leading to his acquittal. Subsequently, the jury deliberated on Peiper's case and returned a verdict of "Not Guilty," resulting in his discharge. In another matter, George Charles Weed, convicted of sodomy, was brought before the court to receive sentencing. Mr Justice Greson imposed a sentence of two years' imprisonment with hard labour on him. Following this, the court adjourned until the 14th instant for civil proceedings.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:13th October 1874
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp18741013_2_31.html