First reading of the Bill

This abstract summarizes the first reading of the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill that took place on August 29, 2012, in the Parliament Buildings, Wellington, New Zealand. The Bill, introduced by Labour MP Louisa Wall, sought to redefine marriage as a union between two people, regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The goal was to actualize marriage equality for all consenting adults, aligning with values of love, fairness, and equality. The Bill passed with 80 ayes to 40 noes.

Throughout the reading, various MPs expressed their positions on the Bill. The recording begins with Louisa Wall, the bill's sponsor, discussing the history of New Zealand's progressive human rights movement on the international stage, including leadership in women's suffrage and the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation. Wall emphasized that the bill did not oblige religious institutions to perform marriages contrary to their beliefs, maintaining the freedom of religion.

Nikki Kaye, representing the National Party, spoke in favor of the bill, highlighting New Zealand's history of fighting for equality and the importance of the bill in ensuring justice and dignity for all New Zealanders. Kaye addressed opposition concerns about religious freedom, emphasizing that such issues can be addressed in committee.

MP Su'a William Sio voiced opposition to the bill, representing concerns within Pacific and faith communities about the societal ramifications of redefining marriage, while urging respectful debate on the matter.

Green Party MP Kevin Hague argued for the bill, pointing out the health and well-being benefits for young LGBTQ individuals in a society that does not discriminate against them.

Winston Peters, speaking for New Zealand First, advocated for a public referendum on the issue, stressing that the public, rather than Parliament, should decide on such a significant change to the institution of marriage.

In contrast, MP Paul Hutchison supported the bill, stating that they could not formulate tangible arguments against it and recognized the potential advantages, such as reduced marginalization and mental health benefits for young people.

John Hayes spoke of the varied views within their electorate, with some seeing the bill as unnecessary given the existing civil union framework, while others see it as advancing discrimination.

MP Jami-Lee Ross brought a personal perspective, asserting that their beliefs in individual freedom, equal opportunity, and strong families aligned with supporting the bill and extending the right to marry to all New Zealanders.

In closing the debate, Louisa Wall remarked on the progress made toward equality over the past 50 years and reiterated the distinction between civil law and religious beliefs, emphasizing that the bill seeks legal inclusion for all under state law without affecting personal religious convictions.

This summary is created using Generative AI. Although it is based on the recording's transcription, it may contain errors or omissions. Click here to learn more about how this summary was created.

David Clark Jami-Lee Ross John Hayes Kevin Hague Lockwood Smith Louisa Wall Nikki Kaye Paul Hutchison Su'a William Sio Tim Macindoe Winston Peters

aotearoa new zealand, christianity, church, civil union act (2004), civil unions, david clark, georgina beyer, human rights, jami-lee ross, john hayes, kevin hague, law, lockwood smith, louisa wall, marriage, marriage amendment act (2012), marriage equality, new zealand herald, nikki kaye, parliament buildings, parliament tv, paul hutchison, politics, presbyterian, prostitution reform act (2003), raymond huo, religion, su'a william sio, tim macindoe, wellington, winston peters

1990s, abuse, acceptance, access, adoption, adultery, advice, advocate, agenda, alcohol, ancestors, anger, anglican church, attack, attempted suicide, attitude, balance, barriers, bars, belief, benefits, bible, binding, binding referendum, blessing, board, boat, boundaries, broken, bullying, campaign for marriage equality, capital, career, celebrant, celebration, change, children, chinese, choice, christmas, citizenship, class, collective, community, compassion, compromise, confidence, conscience vote, consent, conversation, council, courage, covenant, culture, data, dating, david, death, declaration, democracy, denial, depression, desertion, desire, difference, dignity, discrimination, diversity, divorce, drug abuse, education, environment, equality, exercise, extinction, face, faith, family, family court, fear, feelings, fiji, film, food, freedom, friends, future, gallery, gaming, gay, gender, gender identity, god, government, green party, gym, harassment, hate, health, heritage, heterosexual, hiding, high court, history, hit, holding hands, homosexual, homosexual law reform, hope, human rights commission, identity, inclusion, individual, injustice, isolation, justice, kicked out, kira, knowledge, korea, labels, leadership, legal rights, legislation, lesbian, lgbt, love, macklemore, mainstream, marriage equality, media, meetings, member of parliament, mental health, military, minority, morality, national party, nature, normal, opportunity, other, pacific, parents, parties, passing, passion, passport, peace, people, perception, petition, podcast, policy, power, prayer, prejudice, prevention, priorities, privilege, procreation, property rights, proposal, queer, questioning, race, rainbow, reading, recognition, referendum, relationships, research, respect, select committee, self esteem, self harm, separation, sex, sexual orientation, sexuality, siblings, sin, social, solidarity, spectrum, straight, study, suicide, support, suppression, time, tolerance, top, tough, tradition, trans, transgender, trust, truth, understanding, unions, united nations, values, violence, voice, vote, west coast, women, work, youth