AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Second reading debate

Audio from parts of the debate during the second reading of the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, 23 October 1985 (part 1 of 2).

Audio and Text Download mp3Plain Text (for Gen AI)

Details

A more detailed log of this recording is available on the LAGANZ website, see pages 0217-AB, 0218-AB and 0219-AB.

  • 0:01:13 - Ann Hercus   (Lyttelton, Labour Party)
  • 0:15:36 - Peter Tapsell   (Eastern Maori, Labour Party)
  • 0:19:45 - [cassette ends; recording stops abruptly]
  • 0:31:55 - Maurice McTigue   (Timaru, National Party)
  • 0:47:08 - Frank O'Flynn   (Island Bay, Labour Party)
  • 1:00:50 - Bill Dillon   (Hamilton East, Labour Party)

Summary

This is a summary of the second reading debate on the Homosexual Law Reform Bill held on October 23, 1985, part one, recorded in the Parliament buildings in Wellington. The speakers featured in this recording include Ann Hercus, Bill Dillon, Frank O'Flynn, Maurice McTigue, and Peter Tapsell. During this debate, various parliamentarians expressed their perspectives and arguments both in favor of and against the bill.

The key issue debated was the decriminalization of homosexual acts between consenting adults. Supporters of the bill argued that existing laws were out-of-date, discriminatory, and caused unacceptable harm and distress to homosexual individuals. The primary goal of the bill was to eliminate these negative effects and cease treating homosexuality as a criminal offense. Proponents of the bill also expressed that the vote should be driven not by personal prejudice but by a conscientious judgment of what is best for society. They stated that the bill was not about promoting homosexuality but about removing the stigma and penalties associated with it.

In contrast, those opposed to the bill argued that homosexuality was immoral, abnormal, and not in line with family values, which are seen as the cornerstone of society. Some speakers expressed concerns that the decriminalization of homosexuality could lead to the deterioration of moral standards and negatively affect the social fabric. Opponents pointed to large numbers of petition signatories as an indicator of public opposition to the reform.

Beyond the central question of decriminalization, two additional elements sparked significant debate. The first concerns the age of consent. Some parliamentarians supported standardizing the age of consent for both heterosexual and homosexual acts, while others believed a higher age of consent should be maintained to protect young boys. The second element involved extending human rights protections to prevent discrimination against individuals based on their sexual orientation, with opinions divided on whether such measures should be included.

Throughout the discussion, parliamentarians cited various polls, petitions, and personal communication with constituents as indicators of public opinion, though the accuracy of some of these sources was called into question. The speakers also referenced both the need for compassion and the respect of human dignity in addressing the rights of homosexual individuals.

This summary is created using Generative AI. Although it is based on the recording's transcription, it may contain errors or omissions. Click here to learn more about how this summary was created.

Tags (computer generated)

acceptance, acting, actions, activities, adultery, advice, age of consent, aggression, animals, apathy, archives, attitude, balance, beating, belief, blackmail, boxes, building, career, cbs, change, children, chill, chinese, choice, church, circus, class, code, community, conscience vote, consent, council, courage, courts, crime, decriminalisation, degenerate, deviant, difference, dignity, discrimination, economy, education, employment, environment, epidemic, euthanasia, events, exercise, experiment, expression, family, fashion, feelings, fire, gallery, gay, general election, german, god, hamilton, health, heterosexual, history, hit, homosexual law reform, hope, human rights commission, humanism, identity, individual, intolerance, introversion, israel, job, justice, knowledge, legislation, lesbian, lifestyle, loss, love, marriage, medicine, meetings, member of parliament, middle class, military, minority, mirror, mistakes, morality, murder, nature, normal, north shore, nurse, opportunity, oppression, other, parents, parties, passing, passion, passive, people, persecution, petition, police, power, prejudice, preservation, procreation, proposal, proposition, publishing, race, reading, referendum, rehabilitation, rejection, relationships, research, respect, rhetoric, sadism, safety, school, self preservation, sex, sexual orientation, sexuality, smoking, social, social credit party, sodomy, soul, spectrum, speech, support, surgeon, surgery, survey, teaching, tension, time, tolerance, tradition, treat, understanding, uniform, university, unnatural, upper class, values, violence, voice, vote, waikato, waikato times, water, wisdom, witness, women

Record date:23rd October 1985
Audio courtesy of:Lesbian and Gay Archives of New Zealand (LAGANZ)
Location:Parliament buildings, Wellington
View on Map
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/homosexual_law_reform_parliament_23_october_1985_part_1.html