AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact

Insurance discrimination is 'offensive'

Tue 20 Nov 2007 In: New Zealand Daily News

Discrimination against gay men in health insurance applications is a breach of New Zealand's human rights and privacy laws - and LGBT network Rainbow Wellington's chairperson says they will continue to challenge the issue both formally and publicly. "For some time we have been received reports from our members that a number of insurance companies have been insisting on information regarding sexual orientation and specific sexual practises on their application forms before they will offer health insurance at reasonable premium," says Tony Simpson, chair of Rainbow Wellington. "In particular these have cropped up when newly contracted partners in civil unions have attempted to extend existing health insurance policies to their new partners on the same terms as heterosexual partners. Asking someone outright if they engage in anal intercourse on an insurance application form is both outrageous and highly offensive, as well as being totally inappropriate and, in our view, a clear breach of the law. This seems to us to be a breach both of the Human Rights Act and the Privacy Act. We aren't going to let this lie," Simpson makes clear. Last year, a review of the relationship between the insurance industry and the administration of the Human Rights Act led Rainbow Wellington to take up their concerns. At about the same time in the context of a discrimination review in Britain, the industry there had agreed to stop seeking such information in offering insurance policies. "Regrettably, the Human Rights Commission did not include any reference to this in their final review report," says Simpson. "We therefore took it up with one of the major companies involved (ING), because we happened to have one of the standard forms they use. But although they tried to justify their position on insurance grounds, they did not respond to our suggestions that this was in breach of human rights legislation. We have therefore referred the matter to both the Privacy Commissioner and the Human Rights Commission." The Privacy Commissioner has not yet responded but the Human Rights Commission has offered an opportunity to meet with the industry and to try and resolve the matter in that forum, Simpson explains. Rainbow Wellington is conscious of the failure to do so in a previous forum but has indicated to the HRC that they will take part in any process which might lead to a resolution, while reserving their rights to pursue the matter through more formal channels.    

Credit: GayNZ.com News Staff

First published: Tuesday, 20th November 2007 - 10:51am

Rights Information

This page displays a version of a GayNZ.com article that was automatically harvested before the website closed. All of the formatting and images have been removed and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly. The article is provided here for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of PrideNZ.com. If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us