AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact

Beyond the Parliamentary campaign for Law Reform

Wed 3 Aug 2016 In: Our Communities View at Wayback View at NDHA

The following is based on a speech Bill Logan, a significant player in the success of the Homosexual Law Reform campaign thirty years ago, gave to last week's HLR celebration event in Christchurch, where it received a standing ovation. Bill Logan I want to argue that homosexual law reform was not, essentially, a parliamentary event. Homosexual law reform came out of years of social struggles – workers struggles, the movement against the Vietnam War, Women’s Liberation, Gay Lib, the 1981 Anti Tour Movement. Gay communities seized the moment after the 1984 election. We didn’t have the numbers in Parliament at that point, not by a long shot. But it looked as if it might be achievable. At that point Fran Wilde, who was a superb figure to put this forward, represented Wellington Central, the most gay-accepting electorate in the country, and a large group of lesbians and gay men there met with her, both before and after the election of 1984. In Wellington in particular lesbians and gay men worked closely together. We were an extraordinarily diverse group, running from almost separatist lesbian feminists to actually quite misogynist rich old men. Sometimes it was very turbulent. Sometimes there were thoughts of murder on both sides. But over time a great deal of respect was built, and even some unexpected friendships. This unity was important because it allowed us to move out to wider constituencies beyond the gay and lesbian communities. Polling showed the efficacy of this approach during the course of the campaign. The Bill was introduced into Parliament in March 1985. We then had sixteen months of amazing, intense struggle. It was a struggle in Parliament, of course, but it was the struggle in the wider society that was the engine powering the struggle in Parliament, and it was gay and lesbian activists and their supporters who were making it happen in the wider society - in the media, and in struggles at meetings, in halls, in demonstrations and in schools and on streets and in families - in cities and towns and workplaces around the country. Eventually we involved wide layers of ordinary decent people throughout the country. None of this happened spontaneously. The bigots were highly organised, through the churches, and in their Concerned Citizens Coalition. And we were organised. So who were the people in Christchurch? Just one example was a Christchurch lesbian called Sue Odlin who made badges. Her partner, Alison Kagan used to travel a lot for her work, and the whole country was supplied with badges from Christchurch. I can only find “I support homosexual law reform” buttons now, but I used to have one of Sue’s badges which was about the monstrous petition against the bill – the petition which was eventually presented at the 'Nuremburg Rally' at Parliament. The badge read “I signed 27 times.” I was talking to Ralph Knowles in Christchurch the other day. He was one of our pioneers who has contributed in his quiet way to our community for so long – since way, way before '85-'86. He was in the Homosexual Law Reform Society in Wellington, if I’m not mistaken in 1970. Ralph and I talked about Robin Duff and Hugh Gaw. Both have since died. Their main roles were not in this campaign but in other activities many of which which prepared the way. Ralph reminded me of Andrew Carstairs and Dennis Walker, who were the co-chairs of the Gay Taskforce in Christchurch in 1985-86. But Ralph never talks of his own role, as the one who actually kept the Christchurch Gay Taskforce together with its weekly meetings through 1985-86. Ralph made the Gay Taskforce happen. So Ralph, was a key community-builder, probably the key community-builder, and it was community, and community-builders who were crucial to our victory. Remember, New Zealand culture was in general fiercely homophobic. Families might eventually get used to a son or daughter being gay – but the disruption of connection was generally prolonged. In those days there were very few careers available to openly gay men or lesbians. So we hid. We coped with life mostly by living in secrecy – by being unnoticed. And now, suddenly, we were at centre of national attention. We had to take a risk. There was a real chance things would change and we had to bet on that. So thousands and thousands gay men and also lesbians took the conversation into their homes and workplaces. Thousands of us answered back when Aunt Mabel said she’d never met anyone like that. That transition in early 1985 from a life in the shadows to the centre of political and social conversation was not easy. We faced a barrage of the most vile insults and rhetoric. They talked obsessively about our supposed sexual practices. They told us we were responsible for spreading AIDS. They told us to get back into the sewers. And the assaults and street violence increased. Every day for sixteen months we were in the media – the newspapers, radio, television. We had to make sure the the journalists were fed – with responses to the bigots, and with positive stories of gay lives. And we had to look after ourselves and our friends going through this huge adjustment. And it worked. Over that period of sixteen moths there was a profound change in the culture, not only in regard to homosexuality, but a weakening of prejudice in general in this country, an opening of minds, a growth in acceptance of difference. It all happened very fast. If you look at the process of cultural change, the events in New Zealand in 1985-86 are quite exceptional internationally in their speed. There was a source of stress in the background while all this was happening which was so severe we tend to suppress it from our memories -- AIDS. At the same time we were fighting this political campaign we gay men were both having to lead our community in a complete revolution in our sexual practices and also to tend to our dying friends. Bruce Burnett, a dear friend and the key founder of HIV/AIDS work in New Zealand, died in June 1985. But it was not just a few. We lost a generation. There are nearly fifty on my list of friends who died. So while we were fighting our political campaign the bizarre irrational social hysteria against AIDS was at its height, reinforcing homophobia as an argument against law reform. Of course, in truth, the public health need for openness about sexuality was an argument for law reform, and we used it. The fight against AIDS was one of our key arguments. The secret to our success in the campaign was not simply in our own activity, of course, but in mobilising wide layers of the broader society, most importantly in the churches, in women’s organisations and in the trade unions. Some of our worst enemies were Christians, but on the other hand it was also strategically important for us to make Christian allies, and we had some who were superb. The liberal wings of all the major denominations played very important roles in the campaign, undermining the authority of the the bigots. Christianity is not a monolith. Against those like Pastor Richard Flynn, who literally wanted to stone us to death, were the likes of Lloyd Geering, New Zealand’s foremost theologian. Indeed, we had nuns, in their full regalia, lobbying Catholic Members of Parliament to support the bill. Women – politicised women – the women in the Labour Party, and also in fact some of the women in the National Party, were key consituencies for us. As a generalisation women have been less afraid of homosexuality than men. The women in the Labour Party were particularly important, because they were a force that the male Members of Parliament ignored at their peril. It’s great to find myself tonight sitting beside my old friend Ruth Dyson. She’s now even Honourable. In those days she was probably the most important link to the women of the Labour Party. The lesbian community was another important network linking in to the women of the Labour Party of course. And now to turn to the trade unions. They were of huge strategic importance in our plan. In some cases unions took a while to see the relevance of the issue to their concerns, but an understanding developed about about the ways in which homophobia was a union issue, and how scapegoating someone as gay was so often used as a device to divide a workplace and prevent the development of solidarity. Brave gay men and lesbians in workplaces pushed the issue, trade union officials who we lobbied pushed the issue. One particular personality who played a tremendous role was Sonja Davies, who has since died. She had been a major leader in the trade union movement and by this time was a Member of Parliament, and she was a lynch-pin of our orientation to the union movement. Eventually, it came to a vote in Parliament - on the night of 9 July. We won by 49 votes to 44. We were not sure about the numbers 'til the votes were cast, and if three of those aye votes had gone the other way we would have lost. That would have been very bad. And if we had lost, it would not have meant things stayed the same as they had been – it would have been a terrible reverse. I was in parliament that night of course. I must say it was pretty euphoric. And we went on to party. And the next day Kim Hill got me up well before dawn to be on Morning Report... I claimed it as an important victory, but warned that we still face a great deal of prejudice and discrimination, and that a reverse was always a possibility. That is still the case. In this society all gains are fragile. We’ve had more victories since. In 1993 we got the human rights part of the bill which we had lost in April 1986. In 2004 we got Civil Unions. And in 2014 we got marriage. But there is something else we’ve got since 1986. We’ve got a new highly privileged professional cast of gays and lesbians. That was inevitable. When the oppression was lifted the income and status distribution among gay men and lesbians inevitably started to closely reflect that of the wider society. That’s liberation, I guess. But it’s a phoney liberation. Think of the issues of homeless queer youth. Free access to good housing is crucial to our communities. Think of HIV/AIDS. Think of the needs of trans folk. Vastly improved free medical medical care is crucial to us. Think of the depression and suicide among our people. The existing psychological services are pathetic. Think of bullying in schools. Think of the abuse of young queers. Sometimes it is good to stop and celebrate our past, and look at what we have done, but let that be to work out how we can achieve the even greater things we need in the future. There is so much to be done. - Bill Logan Bill Logan - 3rd August 2016    

Credit: Bill Logan

First published: Wednesday, 3rd August 2016 - 8:20am

Rights Information

This page displays a version of a GayNZ.com article that was automatically harvested before the website closed. All of the formatting and images have been removed and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly. The article is provided here for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of PrideNZ.com. If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us