AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact

Suppression remains to protect complainant

Tue 21 Apr 2015 In: New Zealand Daily News View at Wayback

Auckland District Court Name suppression for the Auckland man accused of of infecting another man with HIV will continue until at least the end of the month, due to concerns the trial might not proceed if he is publicly identified. The 48-year-old is facing one count of causing grievous bodily harm with reckless disregard and another of committing a criminal nuisance by doing an unlawful act. Judge David Sharp acknowledged concerns expressed by both the prosecution and the defence that public identification of the defendant would easily lead to identification of the complainant. The police prosecutor argued that should the complainant feel he was risking being identified he would withdraw his complaint and the trial would be abandoned. The defence also argued that the results of DNA tests, to indicate the likelihood of the HIV contracted by the complainant originating from the defendant, are not yet available and might have a major impact on whether the trial proceeds. The judge accepted that identification of the complainant would happen as a matter of course if the defendant is identified and noted that for cultural reasons he would be likely to be subject to significant social isolation. The suppression order is to continue at least until the defendant's next court appearance. The judge decided to disallow filming or photography of the defendant by the media including GayNZ.com Daily News for the time being.    

Credit: GayNZ.com Daily News staff

First published: Tuesday, 21st April 2015 - 2:18pm

Rights Information

This page displays a version of a GayNZ.com article that was automatically harvested before the website closed. All of the formatting and images have been removed and some text content may not have been fully captured correctly. The article is provided here for personal research and review and does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of PrideNZ.com. If you have queries or concerns about this article please email us